Selling PropertyUpdated August 18, 2026·9 min read

Combination Deals on Israeli Land: Non-Resident Guide

How an Israeli combination transaction (iska kombinatzia) is taxed for owners abroad: the 30-day declaration, betterment tax on signature, withholding, and VAT.

Adv. Eli Shimony

Adv. Eli Shimony

Israeli Attorney

An heir in Toronto owns a quarter-acre plot near Netanya that her father bought in 1968 and never built on. A developer's letter arrives. He will put up an eight-unit building and hand her four finished apartments, no cash, keys in three years. It reads like a dormant asset finally paying off. Then her Israeli accountant explains that the Israel Tax Authority will treat the day she signs as the day she sold the land, and that the tax bill lands roughly two years before the concrete does.

This is a combination transaction, and for an owner living abroad it is one of the most misunderstood deals in Israeli real estate. The mechanics are not hard, but the timing of the tax is brutal, and almost every trap in it is set at the negotiating table rather than in the law. What follows is how these deals are taxed, who is meant to pay what, and how a non-resident executes one without flying in. If you are also weighing an outright sale, our guide to selling Israeli property as a non-resident sets out the alternative.


What a Combination Transaction Actually Is

A combination transaction (עסקת קומבינציה, iska kombinatzia) is a barter. You give a developer a share of your land, and instead of paying you money, the developer's consideration is the construction he carries out on the part you keep. No bank transfer changes hands, and that is exactly what misleads owners abroad. Israeli tax law does not care that no cash moved. Consideration in kind is consideration, so the transfer of a land share is a sale of a right in land, and betterment tax attaches to it.

There are two structures, and the difference matters. In a full combination, you notionally sell the whole plot and buy back the finished apartments, which is clean to describe but rarely used because it doubles the tax friction. In a partial combination, the common form, you sell the developer only a defined fraction of the rights, say fifty per cent, and are taxed on that fraction alone. The Israeli courts treat a partial combination as a single transaction rather than two, which keeps the arithmetic contained.

The developer pays purchase tax on the share he acquires. You pay betterment tax (מס שבח, mas shevach) on the share you part with. The value on which your tax is charged is not a price, because there is no price. It is the value of the building services the developer will provide to you on the land you retained.

In Practice: A combination deal is a sale under the Real Estate Taxation Law 5723-1963, and Section 73 requires the declaration to reach the Israel Tax Authority real estate taxation office (misui mekarkein) within 30 days of signature. Betterment tax for an individual runs at 25% on the real gain. On a plot worth NIS 6 million where you transfer half the rights, the exposure on signing is commonly NIS 300,000 to NIS 600,000, and the apartments meant to fund it are handed over 24 to 40 months later.

How the Tax Is Calculated, and Why the Number Surprises People

Because your consideration is construction rather than cash, the whole tax turns on how the building services are valued. This is the single most litigated point in combination taxation, and there is a rule worth knowing before a developer's valuer sends you a figure.

The taxable value is the cost of the building services the developer supplies on your retained land, measured at the date of the sale. Developers and the Tax Authority have fought for years over whether that figure should include the developer's entrepreneurial profit, the margin he expects to make as the person driving the project. The Supreme Court settled it: in a partial-combination deal, the entrepreneurial profit is left out, and only the contractor's profit, the ordinary builder's margin, is folded into the value. The Tax Authority's own Execution Instruction 23/98 (hora'at bitzua) applies the same approach. That distinction can move the taxable base by a wide margin, so the valuation is a place to bring your own expert rather than accept the developer's.

Now sit that against your cash position. You owe Israeli tax on a transaction that produced no money, in a currency you may not hold, calculated on the value of apartments that are years away. An owner abroad cannot simply draw on the deal to pay the deal. That is why the funding of the tax has to be written into the contract, which brings us to the withholding.

The Withholding Advance and the Trap of Silence

Israeli law does not leave the tax to chance. The purchaser in a real estate transaction must withhold an advance against the seller's tax and remit it to the Tax Authority. In an ordinary cash sale that advance comes out of the price. In a combination deal there is no price to withhold from, so the obligation has to be funded deliberately, and by whom is a matter of negotiation.

In Practice: Under Section 15(b) of the Real Estate Taxation Law 5723-1963, the purchaser withholds an advance of 15% of the consideration where the land was acquired before 7 November 2001 and 7.5% where it was acquired later, paid to the Israel Tax Authority and credited against the seller's assessment. On a combination consideration valued at NIS 3 million, that advance is NIS 225,000 or NIS 450,000, and in a barter deal the parties must state in the contract who provides it. A developer who agrees to carry it before signature will resist doing so afterwards, and the assessment itself is finalised over 8 to 12 months.

Here is the part that catches non-residents. If the agreement is silent on who pays the betterment tax and funds the Section 15(b) advance, that silence resolves in the developer's favour the moment you sign. Developers routinely agree to pay the seller's betterment tax outright, or to post a bank guarantee for it, because for them it is a line in a project budget rather than a personal cash call. But that concession is leverage you hold only until signature. Raise it after, and you are asking a favour rather than striking a term.

There is one more cost that does not announce itself. The construction services the developer provides to you carry VAT at 18%, and a private owner cannot reclaim it, so the four apartments in the opening scenario cost more than four apartments appear to. Our note on VAT on new-build apartments in Israel explains why the tax sits where it does.

When the Land Carries a Family Home

Many of these plots are not bare fields. They carry an old house that was the family's Israeli home, and that changes the tax picture in a way that is worth real money.

Section 49A(b) of the Real Estate Taxation Law 1963, in the form it has taken since 1 August 2013, governs how the single-residence exemption from betterment tax interacts with a combination deal. Applied well, part of your gain can shelter behind the residential exemption. Applied carelessly, you can waste the exemption or trigger it on the wrong slice of the deal. Because a non-resident faces an extra hurdle in claiming the residential exemption at all, needing a certificate from the home-country tax authority proving no other residence, this is an analysis to run before you answer the developer, not after.

Executing the Deal Without Flying In

Every step of a combination transaction can be done from abroad, but each one has a non-resident wrinkle.

The agreement is signed on your behalf by an Israeli lawyer holding a notarised and apostilled power of attorney. The declaration to the Tax Authority is filed electronically by that lawyer or your Israeli accountant within the 30-day window. The one thing you cannot outsource is the decision to sign, and the arithmetic behind it, because once the contract is executed the tax date is fixed.

Two structural problems collapse more of these deals than the tax does. First, co-ownership. If the plot is held by several heirs, a combination deal cannot be signed by some of them; every co-owner has to join, and a family scattered across three countries has to reach agreement on price, timing, and which apartments go to whom. Second, the registration gap. Where the land is still registered in a deceased parent's name, no combination agreement can complete until a succession order is obtained and the heirs are registered on the tabu. That single missing step is the most common reason a promising combination offer stalls in negotiation.

Common Mistake: A non-resident owner signs a developer's draft that says nothing about who pays the betterment tax or funds the Section 15(b) withholding, assuming it will be sorted out later. Under the Real Estate Taxation Law 5723-1963, the seller carries that tax by default, so the owner ends up owing the Israel Tax Authority a shekel sum in the hundreds of thousands within 30 days of signature, with no cash from the deal to pay it and apartments still years away. Reopening the point after signing typically costs another 4 to 8 weeks of negotiation and, more often, the money itself.

Practical Checklist

  • Model the betterment tax on the combination value before you reply to the developer, using your own valuer, and confirm whether the residential exemption under Section 49A(b) is in play.
  • Negotiate in writing who pays the betterment tax and who funds the Section 15(b) advance, and secure it with a bank guarantee rather than a promise.
  • Confirm the title is clean: complete any succession order and register all heirs on the tabu before signing, and make sure every co-owner is party to the deal.
  • Budget for the 18% VAT on the construction services, which a private owner cannot reclaim.
  • Appoint an Israeli lawyer under a notarised and apostilled power of attorney so the agreement can be signed and declared without you travelling.
  • Fix the delivery obligations, dates, standards, and remedies for delay, with guarantees that survive the developer running into difficulty.

Speak With an Israeli Attorney

A combination offer is answered best before it is accepted, because the tax date and the allocation of costs are both fixed at signature. We model the betterment tax on the offer, negotiate who carries the tax and the withholding, and secure the developer's delivery obligations with guarantees that hold up if the project stumbles.

Contact us for a confidential initial consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. Under the Real Estate Taxation Law 1963, consideration in kind is still consideration, so handing a developer part of your land in exchange for construction services is a sale of a right in land. Betterment tax (mas shevach) falls due on the fraction you transfer, valued by the building services you receive, and the declaration is due within 30 days of signing under Section 73. The absence of cash does not delay the tax.

Related Questions

Common questions on this topic answered by our attorneys.

Real Case Studies

How non-residents resolved similar situations with our help.

Related Guides

About the Author

Adv. Eli Shimony

Adv. Eli Shimony

Israeli Attorney

LL.B. + M.B.A.Israeli Bar Association MemberCertified Compliance Officer (ICA)Certified Mediator & Arbitrator

Adv. Eli Shimony is the founder of IsraelNonResident.com and a practising Israeli attorney specialising in inheritance, real estate, and cross-border legal matters for non-resident clients worldwide.

Legal Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Israeli law is complex and fact-specific. Always consult with a qualified Israeli attorney before taking any action regarding your specific situation. See our full disclaimer.