Israel changed the way courts read contracts in January 2026. Does that affect the Israeli purchase agreement I am about to sign from the United States?

For thirty years an Israeli judge could look past what a contract said and ask what the parties had really meant. That was the legacy of the Supreme Court's 1995 Apropim ruling, and American buyers who assumed Israeli contracts worked like a New York purchase and sale agreement were regularly surprised by it. The Knesset closed most of that gap on 5 January 2026. If your Israeli signing date falls after 6 January 2026, the document in front of you now carries far more weight than the conversations around it.

---

Detailed Answer

Amendment No. 3 to the Contracts (General Part) Law 5733-1973 was approved in second and third readings on 5 January 2026 by 18 votes to 4 with 2 abstentions, and published in the Official Gazette on 6 January 2026. It rewrote Section 25, the provision that tells a court how to interpret a contract, and it splits contracts into two classes. A business contract is interpreted according to its wording. A court may go beyond the wording only in two situations: where reading the text as written produces an unacceptable outcome, or where the contract's own provisions contradict each other. A non-business contract is interpreted according to the parties' intent as it emerges from the contract and the circumstances, and in weighing those circumstances the court looks at matters such as the relationship between the parties, gaps in the information available to each of them, how detailed the contract is, the parties' professional experience, and whether they had legal representation. The amendment also lets parties who were legally represented write their own interpretation rules into the contract, which is a genuine change in Israeli practice. It applies to contracts signed after 6 January 2026 and to contracts renewed after that date. Anything signed earlier stays under the Apropim approach, so for the next several years Israeli practitioners will be running two regimes side by side.

A non-resident buyer feels this in a specific way. Most Israeli residential purchase agreements are drafted in Hebrew by the seller's lawyer, negotiated by email across a seven-hour time difference, and explained to the buyer in summary by their own Israeli counsel. Under the old approach a buyer who could show that both sides had understood a clause a particular way had a real argument even where the Hebrew text said something narrower. That argument is now much weaker in a transaction the court treats as a business contract, and a purchase of an investment apartment by a foreign investor is likely to be characterised that way even though a family home purchase may not be. Three drafting habits follow from this. Get an accurate English translation of the operative clauses and have the discrepancy between the versions addressed by a governing-language clause rather than left open. Put the things you were told orally into the text, particularly delivery dates, what is included in the apartment, who bears the betterment levy, and what happens if the seller's discharge of an existing mortgage is late. And treat side emails as worthless for interpretation purposes unless the contract incorporates them. The same logic reaches the preliminary stage, because a signed memorandum of understanding can bind you before the full contract exists; that trap is covered in our answer on whether a zichron devarim is binding in an Israeli property purchase.

In Practice: Amendment No. 3 to the Contracts (General Part) Law 5733-1973 passed the Knesset on 5 January 2026 and was published in the Official Gazette on 6 January 2026. The rewritten Section 25 reads a business contract on its wording, with recourse to the circumstances only for an unacceptable result or contradictory clauses, and applies to contracts signed or renewed after 6 January 2026. Israeli courts handle interpretation disputes, and a claim in the District Court carries an ad valorem fee of 2.5% of the sum in dispute, half payable on filing, so a dispute over a NIS 3,000,000 apartment can cost NIS 75,000 in fees alone before counsel. Allow 12 to 24 months to judgment.

When to Consult a Lawyer

• You are signing an Israeli contract in Hebrew that you cannot read. A translation prepared for information only carries no interpretive weight, and after the amendment the Hebrew wording is close to decisive, so the governing-language clause needs to be negotiated rather than accepted as boilerplate.
• Your deal was agreed before January 2026 but completes later. Whether the document is a fresh contract or a renewal of the earlier one determines which interpretive regime applies, and sellers have an obvious incentive to characterise it whichever way suits them.
• The contract contains a clause you were told would not be enforced. Assurances that a penalty, a forfeiture of the deposit or an exclusion of liability is "standard and never used" now have almost no purchase against clear wording in a contract the court treats as commercial.

---

Speak With an Israeli Attorney

We review Israeli contracts for non-resident buyers against the new Section 25 test, tighten the wording where an oral understanding is doing work the text does not, and set the governing-language position before signature rather than after a dispute.

Contact us for a confidential initial consultation.