Can a DNA test prove I am my late father's child and entitled to his Israeli estate?

The call usually comes after the test has already been done. A commercial kit was posted to a half-sibling in Haifa, the percentages came back, and the family abroad assumed the question was settled. In Israel it is not merely unpersuasive, it is inadmissible, and the way the test was obtained can make the eventual court application harder rather than easier.

---

Detailed Answer

Israeli law treats genetic testing for family relationships as a controlled procedure rather than a private matter. Section 28A of the Genetic Information Law 5761-2000 provides that such a test may not be carried out except under a court order, and Section 28B places that power with the Family Court. Section 28L closes the loop: results of a test carried out without an order may not be brought before a court or judicial body and are not admissible as evidence. The reason is not bureaucratic. Sections 28D and 28E require the court to consider what the result would do to a minor and whether it could produce a finding of mamzerut, illegitimacy under religious law, in which case the court consults the rabbinical authorities before deciding. Where the mother was married to another man at the time of conception, an Israeli court will approach an order with real caution, and this is the single most common reason an application of this kind fails on grounds that have nothing to do with the science. For the inheritance itself, Section 10 of the Succession Law 1965 makes the deceased's children heirs by law, but the Inheritance Registrar decides on documents. It will not resolve a disputed paternity, and a file in which kinship is contested transfers to the Family Court under Section 67A.

Sampling is the practical obstacle when the person whose paternity is in question has died. Israeli courts commonly order testing against living relatives, an acknowledged child, a sibling or a parent of the deceased, rather than reaching for the grave, because exhumation for evidential purposes is a separate and heavily contested application with its own religious and family objections. Where a hospital or pathology institute still holds a tissue block or a stored sample from the deceased's treatment, that is usually the shortest route and is worth identifying before anything else, since retention periods are finite.

Distance changes the sequencing more than the substance. Nothing about the application requires you to be in Israel, since it is brought by an Israeli lawyer under a notarised and apostilled power of attorney, but the sample itself has to satisfy the court on chain of custody, which means collection at a laboratory or a facility the court accepts and identification against a passport rather than a self-swab posted from home. The timing pressure is separate and often more urgent. Once someone applies for a succession order, Section 67 of the Succession Law 1965 requires publication and a period of at least fourteen days for objections, and an order that issues naming the acknowledged children only is far harder to unwind afterwards than it is to oppose in time. File the objection first, on the basis that kinship is in dispute, and let the genetic application follow. Where the estate is being distributed while you assemble evidence, the position is set out in our answer on objecting to an Israeli succession order from abroad.

In Practice: Section 28A of the Genetic Information Law 5761-2000 bars a family-relationship genetic test without an order of the Family Court, and Section 28L makes the results of an unauthorised test inadmissible, which is why a commercial kit is wasted money. Lodge the objection with the Inheritance Registrar (Rasham HaYerushot) inside the 14-day window under Section 67 of the Succession Law 1965, before an order issues at NIS 597 on paper or NIS 507 online. A file that becomes contested moves to the Family Court under Section 67A, where kinship disputes of this kind commonly run 9 to 24 months and cost NIS 40,000 to NIS 90,000 in fees, expert evidence and translations.

When to Consult a Lawyer

• An application for a succession order has already been published. Objecting inside the statutory window preserves your position while the genetic application is prepared; waiting for the test result first usually means the order has already issued.
• Your mother was married to another man when you were born. That fact changes the application from a question of proof to a question of judicial discretion, and it needs to be addressed in the pleadings rather than discovered by the court.
• The only viable sample belongs to a hospital or a reluctant relative. Preservation and disclosure are separate applications with their own urgency, and stored samples are not kept indefinitely.

---

Speak With an Israeli Attorney

We lodge the objection in time, bring the application for a genetic testing order in the form the Family Court expects, and arrange sampling abroad so the chain of custody survives challenge.

Contact us for a confidential initial consultation.