Can I complain about how an Israeli judge treated me if I don't live in Israel?

The complaint that reaches me is rarely about the outcome. It is about a hearing conducted in Hebrew at a pace nobody would slow down, a foreign heir cut off mid-sentence, a file left without a decision for eleven months, or a remark from the bench about people who inherit Israeli property without ever having lived in the country. Israel has a dedicated office for exactly this, it is independent of the courts, and it is explicitly open to complainants abroad.

---

Detailed Answer

The Ombudsman for Complaints Against Judges Law 5762-2002 created a standing office to examine the conduct of judges in the performance of their judicial function, including the manner in which they run proceedings. Section 14 gives standing to any person who sees themselves as harmed by a judge's conduct, or to someone that person authorises, and the office has confirmed that this extends to children and to people who are not Israeli citizens. Complaints are free and anonymous ones are not handled, so your name and address go on the form. Section 18 sets the clock: one year from the event, from the day you learned of it, or from the final judgment in the case, whichever falls latest, with a discretion to extend in special circumstances. The boundary of the office's work is drawn by Section 17, and it is worth reading before writing anything. Complaints that do not concern a judge or their judicial duties are out. So are complaints raising substantial questions of law or evidence, and matters that could have been dealt with through an appeal, save where the grievance is about judicial conduct itself rather than the ruling. If a police investigation or a disciplinary proceeding covering the same facts is already running, the Ombudsman will not duplicate it.

The distinction between conduct and decision is where non-resident complaints most often fail, and framing is everything. "The judge misapplied Section 55 of the Succession Law" is an appeal point and will be rejected. "The judge refused to allow my sworn evidence to be given by video although I live in Melbourne and had been granted leave to appear remotely, and gave no reason" is conduct. Delay is conduct. Refusing to let an interpreter finish is conduct. Treating a party discourteously is conduct. Practically, everything about the process suits a complainant abroad: the complaint is submitted in writing, in Hebrew, in duplicate on the prescribed form under the Ombudsman for Complaints Against Judges Regulations 5764-2003, signed by you or by an authorised representative whose signed authorisation is attached, and sent by post in a sealed envelope. No hearing, no travel and no Israeli lawyer are required, though a Hebrew-language filing prepared by one is usually the difference between an examination and a rejection on form. Where a complaint is found justified under Section 22, the Ombudsman notifies the complainant and the judge and may recommend remedying the deficiency, disciplinary proceedings, or in the gravest cases that the appropriate committee consider terminating the judge's tenure. What the Ombudsman cannot do is change the result in your case. Nothing about filing suspends or extends an appeal deadline.

In Practice: Under the Ombudsman for Complaints Against Judges Law 5762-2002 any person who considers themselves harmed by an Israeli judge's conduct may complain, including a non-citizen living abroad, free of charge, and Section 18 requires the complaint within one year of the event, of learning of it, or of the final judgment, whichever is latest. Section 17 excludes matters raising substantial questions of law or evidence and matters that belong in an appeal. The examination of a complaint is to be completed within one year of its receipt at the office. The contrast with the litigation route is stark: challenging the decision itself is a paid remedy, where an administrative petition to the Court for Administrative Affairs carries a 2026 court fee of NIS 2,329 and a 45-day deadline.

When to Consult a Lawyer

• Your real grievance is the ruling. Filing an Ombudsman complaint against a judge does not stop the 60-day appeal clock running, and complainants abroad routinely lose the appeal while waiting for an answer that was never going to give them one.
• The conduct affected the evidence. Where a refusal to permit remote testimony, an interpreter or an adjournment shaped what the court actually heard, that is both a conduct complaint and a potential appeal ground, and the two have to be pleaded differently.
• You are still in front of the same judge. Complaining mid-proceeding is permitted but has consequences for how the rest of the case is run, and the decision should be made with an Israeli lawyer who knows the forum. Note that a separate office handles complaints about government bodies rather than judges, covered in our answer on complaining to the Israeli state ombudsman from abroad.

---

Speak With an Israeli Attorney

A complaint that is drafted as conduct rather than as a disguised appeal, filed in Hebrew and inside the one-year window, is examined on its merits; one that is not is closed on the papers.

Contact us for a confidential initial consultation.