How a US Retiree Recovered Over-Withheld Tax on an Israeli Pension

Result: NIS 214,000 in over-withheld pension tax refunded by the Israel Tax Authority · Timeline: 10 months from refund filing · Challenge: Israeli fund taxed a US-resident's pension · Authority: Israel Tax Authority (Rashut HaMasim) · Financial Impact: NIS 214,000 recovered

Background

A woman in her late sixties living near Boston had worked in Israel for eleven years in the 1980s before relocating permanently to the United States. She kept a kupat gemel (provident and pension fund) with an Israeli insurer the whole time, contributing nothing further after she left but letting the balance grow. When she decided to draw it down as a lump sum to help fund her retirement, the fund processed the payment and deducted Israeli tax at 35% before wiring the net amount abroad. On a gross balance of roughly NIS 611,000, that meant more than NIS 214,000 went to the Israeli treasury before she saw a shekel. She had no Israeli address, no active Israeli tax file, and no way to walk into a tax office in person. Her US accountant told her the money was almost certainly recoverable but could not act inside the Israeli system.

The Challenge

The fund did exactly what Israeli domestic law tells it to do. Under Section 164 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1961, the paying institution must withhold tax at source on a pension or provident payment, and where the recipient has no current Israeli assessment confirming a lower rate, the fund applies the high default. The fund is not in a position to interpret a tax treaty on the client's behalf. It withholds, reports the payment to the Israel Tax Authority (Rashut HaMasim), and leaves it to the recipient to reclaim anything that was over-collected.

That is where the cross-border friction begins. A US resident with an Israeli-source pension sits squarely inside Article 20 of the US-Israel income tax treaty, which provides that private pensions and similar payments are taxable only in the country where the recipient is resident. For our client that was the United States. Israel had no right to the tax at all. But a treaty right is not self-executing inside the Israeli withholding machine. Without an active Israeli tax file, a confirmed non-resident status, and a formal refund claim, the NIS 214,000 simply stays with the treasury. The client also had to satisfy her US obligations, because as a US citizen she still reports the pension on her IRS return regardless of the treaty, and we needed to make sure the Israeli refund did not collide with what her accountant filed in the United States.

In Practice: Under Section 164 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1961, an Israeli pension fund withholds at the high default rate when the recipient has no current assessment on file, which is why a US-resident's lump sum was taxed at 35%. Article 20 of the US-Israel tax treaty assigns the taxing right on a private pension to the country of residence, so the entire NIS 214,000 was recoverable from the Israel Tax Authority (Rashut HaMasim) once a refund claim was filed. A non-resident refund of this kind typically takes 8 to 12 months to process once the file is complete.

What We Did

The first job was establishing, on paper, that the client was a non-resident of Israel for the year of the payment. We assembled proof of her US tax residency, her long-standing US address, and the years she had been gone, and we used this to confirm her status with the Israel Tax Authority. Everything she signed was executed in front of a notary near her home and apostilled under the Hague Convention, so the Israeli assessor never needed her to appear.

Next we opened a tax file for the limited purpose of the refund. Israel does not refund withheld tax into a void; there has to be an assessment that recognises the overpayment. We filed an Israeli income tax return for the relevant year reporting the pension and claiming the treaty exemption under Article 20, attached the fund's withholding certificate showing the NIS 214,000 deducted, and included a residency certificate confirming she was taxable as a US resident. We coordinated with her US accountant so the timing of the Israeli refund and her US reporting lined up, which matters because the pension was fully taxable in the United States and we did not want her claiming an Israeli foreign tax credit for tax that was about to come back.

The assessor came back with the standard questions. They wanted to confirm she had made no Israeli-source income in the year beyond the pension, and they queried whether any part of the fund related to employment performed in Israel that might fall outside the pension article. We answered with the fund's own contribution history, which showed every shekel had accrued from her pre-1990 employment and subsequent growth, all of it pension in character. The whole exchange ran by email and through our office, never requiring the client to travel.

One nuance mattered here and catches people who try to read the treaty themselves. The US-Israel treaty contains a saving clause that lets the United States tax its own citizens almost as if the treaty did not exist, which is why a US citizen still reports an Israeli pension to the IRS. That clause restricts what the United States gives up; it does not give Israel a taxing right it never had. The pension article assigns the tax to the country of residence, and for this client Israel was simply not entitled to collect. So while she remained fully taxable in the United States, the entire Israeli withholding was recoverable, and we structured the claim around that distinction rather than around any partial credit. We also set up a dedicated Israeli account to receive the refund, since the Israel Tax Authority pays a refund into an Israeli bank account rather than wiring it directly to a foreign one, and we arranged the onward transfer abroad once the funds landed.

In Practice: A treaty-based refund claim must be supported by a US residency certificate (IRS Form 6166) confirming the client is a US resident for treaty purposes. The Israel Tax Authority will not release a refund without it. Obtaining Form 6166 from the IRS takes 6 to 8 weeks, so we requested it at the start rather than waiting for the Israeli assessor to demand it, which kept the NIS 214,000 claim moving instead of stalling for two months.

The Outcome

Ten months after we filed the refund claim, the Israel Tax Authority issued an assessment recognising that the pension was not taxable in Israel and refunded the full NIS 214,000, plus statutory interest and linkage for the period the treasury had held the money. Israeli refunds carry interest and consumer-price linkage from the date of overpayment, so the delay, while frustrating, was not costless to the treasury and added several thousand shekels to what she received back. The funds were paid to an Israeli account we had set up to receive them and then transferred to her US bank. Because we had coordinated with her accountant, her US return reported the pension correctly as US-taxable income with no Israeli credit, so there was no clawback or amended filing on the American side. The client recovered money she had assumed was simply lost to a foreign tax system she could not navigate from Massachusetts.

Key Takeaways

What this case illustrates for non-residents in similar situations:

1. An Israeli pension fund withholding tax at source is not the final word. The fund applies the default rate because it has no assessment on file, not because the tax is genuinely owed. The right to reclaim it lives with you, not with the fund.
2. The US-Israel treaty assigns private pension taxation to the country of residence under Article 20, which means a US resident generally owes no Israeli tax on an Israeli pension. But the refund only happens if you file an Israeli return and claim it.
3. Get the IRS residency certificate (Form 6166) early. It is the single document the Israel Tax Authority will insist on, and the lead time to obtain it often dictates how fast the whole refund moves.
4. Coordinate the Israeli refund with your US accountant before you file either side. A pension that is US-taxable should not also be carrying an Israeli foreign tax credit if that Israeli tax is about to be returned.

---

Facing a Similar Situation?

If an Israeli pension, provident fund, or insurer has withheld tax on a payment to you abroad, the amount taken at source is often far higher than what you actually owe once the relevant treaty is applied. Recovering it is a matter of filing the right claim with the right supporting documents, all of which can be handled remotely. You may also want to read our guide to the US-Israel tax treaty and how it allocates taxing rights.

Contact us for a confidential consultation about your Israeli legal matter.