How US Parents of a Lone Soldier Won Israeli Residency
An Ohio couple with no Law of Return entitlement obtained A/5 residence in Israel under Procedure 5.2.0036, filed against their daughter's IDF discharge date.
Outcome
Both parents received A/5 temporary residence under Population and Immigration Authority Procedure 5.2.0036, seven months after the first filing and eleven weeks before their daughter's discharge date, placing them on the four-year track to permanent residency.
Result: Both parents issued A/5 temporary residence permits and placed on the graduated track toward permanent residency ยท Timeline: 7 months from first filing to both permits ยท Challenge: An IDF discharge date that would close the route entirely ยท Authority: Population and Immigration Authority, Procedure 5.2.0036 ยท Financial Impact: NIS 6,180 in fees, apostilles, translation and representation
Background
The daughter converted in Ohio, made aliyah at nineteen, and enlisted eight months later. Her parents stayed in Columbus. Neither of them is Jewish, neither has a Jewish parent or grandparent, and nothing in the Law of Return 5710-1950 gives them any entitlement at all. They had visited on tourist visas four times in three years, each visit capped at three months, each one ending with a departure their daughter drove them to. The father is 58 and had already agreed to take early retirement from a manufacturing job. What they wanted was not a longer holiday. They wanted to live in the same country as their only child.
They came to us with the wrong plan. Their intention was a humanitarian application, on the theory that a parent separated from a child in military service is a compassionate case. That route exists, it runs through an inter-ministerial committee, and it is discretionary from beginning to end. There was a defined track available to them instead, and it was going to close.
The Challenge
Population and Immigration Authority Procedure 5.2.0036 governs the grant of status to the parent of a soldier. It was published on 22 May 2022 and took effect on 1 July 2022, following Knesset Interior Committee pressure over the position of lone soldiers whose families remained abroad and could not support them. The procedure sets out a graduated path: the parent enters on a B/2 visitor visa obtained before travel, applies in Israel for A/5 temporary residence, renews the A/5 across a period of up to four years, and may then request permanent residency.
The conditions are specific, and two of them controlled the case. The soldier must be serving in mandatory service and must have completed at least twelve months, and the call-up must be for a period exceeding eighteen months. The second condition is the one that ends most of these files before they start: since 1 January 2022, a soldier who has completed regular service can no longer bring a parent under this procedure. The route is open during service and closes on discharge.
Their daughter had fourteen months left when they first wrote to us. By the time the file was ready she had nine. Everything after that was a scheduling problem dressed up as an immigration problem, and the parents were 9,500 kilometres from every counter involved.
In Practice: Procedure 5.2.0036 of the Population and Immigration Authority requires the soldier to be in mandatory service, to have served at least twelve months, and to be serving under a call-up exceeding eighteen months, and it closes to a soldier who has completed regular service. Status begins with a B/2 visitor visa of up to three months, converts in Israel to an A/5 temporary residence permit issued for one year at a fee of roughly NIS 175 per issuance, and runs for up to four years before permanent residency may be requested.
What We Did
Work split into two streams that had to converge on one date. The Israeli stream belonged to the daughter, because Procedure 5.2.0036 requires the soldier herself to attend the Population and Immigration Authority bureau in person. She booked the appointment eleven weeks out, which is normal for a bureau serving a large district, and used a single leave day for it. She collected the service confirmation from her induction and manpower office rather than from her unit, since a unit letter is not what the bureau accepts, and she signed the invitation on the bureau's own form.
The American stream was the slow one. Family connection has to be proved with authenticated documents, and authentication in the United States is split across authorities that do not talk to each other. The two birth certificates and the marriage certificate were issued by Ohio and carried Ohio Secretary of State apostilles. The police clearances were a different matter. A state background check apostilled in Columbus is not the same document as a Federal Bureau of Investigation identity history summary, and a federal document is apostilled by the United States Department of State in Washington, not by any state office. We ordered both and lodged both, because a bureau clerk deciding whether a foreign good conduct certificate is adequate will not send it back for improvement, and a file that stalls on a document question loses weeks that this family did not have.
One discrepancy nearly derailed the file. The mother's Ohio birth certificate records a surname she stopped using in 1991, three years before the marriage certificate, and her passport shows only the married name. Israeli registries treat unexplained name variation as a break in the chain rather than as an obvious inference. We resolved it with a notarised affidavit of identity sworn in Columbus, apostilled with the birth certificate, and translated into Hebrew by notarial translation at NIS 251 for the first 100 words and NIS 197 for each further 100.
Sequence mattered as much as content. The parents applied for B/2 visitor visas before flying, rather than arriving and asking to change status from an entry stamp, and they said plainly at the consulate that a status application under the soldier procedure would follow in Israel. Concealing the intention and then converting from an ordinary tourist entry is the standard way these files acquire a credibility problem. They flew in with the apostilled bundle in hand luggage, attended the bureau with their daughter, and filed on the day of her appointment.
In Practice: Under the Entry into Israel Law 5712-1952 the A/5 permit is a temporary residence status, not an oleh status, and it carries no Law of Return consequence. The parents did not become olim, took no absorption basket, and acquired no automatic citizenship. Their daughter's own status under the Law of Return was unaffected by the application, and their file was decided solely on the conditions in Procedure 5.2.0036.
The Outcome
The bureau approved both applications and issued the A/5 permits seven months after the first filing, eleven weeks before the daughter's discharge. Each permit runs for one year and is renewable, and the four-year period that opens the door to permanent residency began on the date of issue rather than on the date of first entry. The parents now hold Israeli health coverage through the residency status, may work without a separate permit, and are no longer counted against the ninety-day visitor limit that had defined their family life for three years.
Total cost came to NIS 6,180. That figure covers the two visa fees, both sets of apostilles, the federal and state clearances, the notarial affidavit, the Hebrew translations and our representation through the filing. The humanitarian petition they arrived intending to bring would have cost several times that and would have been decided on discretion rather than on stated conditions.
The father put it more simply. He said the difference between a tourist and a resident is that a resident can be bored. He now sits in a Ramat Gan flat on days when his daughter is on base and nobody counts the days he has left.
Key Takeaways
What this case illustrates for non-residents in similar situations:
- The soldier's discharge date is the deadline that governs everything. Procedure 5.2.0036 is open to the parent of a serving soldier and closes when regular service ends. Count backwards from the discharge date, allow eleven weeks for the bureau appointment, and allow another two months for United States document authentication before you decide whether the route is realistically available.
- The soldier must appear in person, so build the file around her leave. Nothing in this track can be completed by a parent alone from abroad, and no power of attorney substitutes for the soldier at the counter.
- American authentication runs through two separate authorities. State-issued vital records are apostilled by the Secretary of State of the issuing state. Federal documents, including an FBI identity history summary, are apostilled by the United States Department of State. Sending the wrong one costs a month.
- Enter on a B/2 visa applied for in advance and say what you intend to do. Arriving as an ordinary tourist and converting later invites the bureau to treat the whole application as an afterthought.
- A/5 residence is not aliyah and should not be confused with it. Parents who take this route stay foreign nationals with a residence permit, which for a retiree with United States pension and Social Security arrangements is frequently the outcome they actually want.
Facing a Similar Situation?
Parents of soldiers, parents of adult Israeli children, and foreign spouses all reach Israeli status through separate tracks with different conditions, and choosing the wrong one costs a year. Our guide on bringing a foreign parent to live in Israel sets out the alternatives, and the A/5 temporary resident visa guide explains what the permit itself allows.
Contact us for a confidential consultation about your Israeli legal matter.
Key Takeaways for Non-Residents
This case illustrates the importance of engaging experienced Israeli legal counsel early in the process. The complexity of cross-border matters โ including language barriers, document requirements, and court procedures โ makes professional guidance essential.
Related Q&A

Adv. Eli Shimony
Israeli Attorney
Adv. Eli Shimony is the founder of IsraelNonResident.com and a practising Israeli attorney specialising in inheritance, real estate, and cross-border legal matters for non-resident clients worldwide.
Note: This case study is based on a real matter. All identifying details โ including names, locations, nationalities, and financial figures โ have been anonymized and modified to protect confidentiality. The outcome described reflects the specific facts of that particular case and does not constitute a guarantee, representation, or warranty of any result in any other matter. Legal outcomes are inherently fact-specific and depend on individual circumstances, applicable law at the time, and factors that vary from case to case. Nothing in this case study constitutes legal advice, and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for qualified legal counsel in any specific situation. See our full disclaimer.