Dual US-Israeli Citizen Restores Israeli Permanent Residency After 25 Years Abroad

How a 68-year-old New Yorker regained Israeli permanent residency, enrolled in Kupat Holim, and secured subsidised healthcare — without making aliyah again.

Outcome

Permanent residency was restored after 8 months. He enrolled in Kupat Holim Meuhedet and now pays NIS 1,750 per month in health insurance premiums rather than NIS 4,200 for private Israeli coverage.

Background

He made aliyah in 1998, served in the Israeli army reserve, and built a career in Israeli high-tech during the dot-com years. Then, in 2001, a job offer in Manhattan changed the trajectory. He moved to New York, told himself it was temporary, and stayed for two and a half decades.

Throughout those years, he remained an Israeli citizen. He renewed his Israeli passport three times at the Israeli Consulate in New York, voted in two Israeli elections, and flew to Israel for family events with his Israeli-born mother until she passed in 2019. There was never any question about his citizenship — Israeli nationality, unlike Israeli permanent residency, does not lapse with absence.

What he did not know, until he began exploring the possibility of spending winters in Tel Aviv from age 65, was that his permanent residency (toshav keva) status had been quietly revoked. In 2009, the Ministry of Interior's Population and Immigration Authority (Rashut HaHistadrut V'HaAliyah) had determined — through an administrative process that produced no notice to him in New York — that he no longer maintained a "center of life" in Israel and had reclassified him as an ezrach yoshev b'hutz l'aretz (Israeli citizen residing abroad).

The distinction matters enormously. An Israeli citizen living abroad retains all rights of citizenship: the right to return, to vote, to hold an Israeli passport. But without toshav keva status, that citizen cannot enroll in the National Health Insurance scheme (bituach briut), cannot receive Israeli public pension benefits, and is treated by Israeli government ministries and public utilities as a foreigner in administrative dealings — despite holding an Israeli identity card.

The Challenge

He wanted three things when he came to us in early 2023: to restore his permanent residency, to enroll in a Kupat Holim health fund (kupa) before turning 70, and to understand the tax implications of spending 4–5 months per year in Israel without triggering Israeli tax residency.

The first challenge was legal: permanent residency restoration is not guaranteed and is discretionary under the Entry to Israel Law 1952. Unlike aliyah — which creates an automatic right to citizenship under the Law of Return — there is no parallel right to toshav keva restoration. The Population and Immigration Authority evaluates each case on the applicant's demonstrated intention to re-establish an Israeli center of life.

The catch is that the Authority uses "intention" loosely. An applicant who does not already live in Israel has difficulty demonstrating Israeli ties. But you cannot move to Israel before your residency is restored. It is a bureaucratic circularity that leaves many returning dual citizens in limbo.

The second challenge was financial. Under Section 3 of the National Health Insurance Law 1994, an individual who regains toshav keva status is entitled to enroll in a Kupat Holim, but must serve a waiting period before coverage begins. For individuals returning after an extended absence, the waiting period is 6 months, during which they must pay premiums but receive no coverage. Worse, the National Insurance Institute (Bituach Leumi) can demand payment of back-contributions for any period during which the individual was classified as a resident but failed to contribute — a liability that, for a high earner, can reach NIS 50,000–80,000.

The third challenge — Israeli tax residency — was actually the simplest. Under Section 1 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1961, a citizen who spends fewer than 183 days per year in Israel and fewer than 425 days across a rolling three-year period is presumed to be a non-resident for tax purposes. Staying 4–5 months annually (120–150 days) would keep him safely within the non-resident threshold, provided he managed his stays carefully and did not acquire Israeli-sourced income beyond passive investment returns.

In Practice: Under the Entry to Israel Law 1952 (Hok HaKnisa L'Yisrael) and the Interior Ministry's administrative guidelines, an Israeli citizen applying to restore permanent residency must demonstrate a genuine intention to centre their life in Israel. In practice, the Population and Immigration Authority (Rashut HaHistadrut V'HaAliyah) gives substantial weight to three factors: property ownership or a signed long-term lease in Israel, registration with an Israeli healthcare provider or GP, and Israeli bank account activity. Applications supported by all three are processed within 4–8 months; those lacking any one factor frequently require a personal hearing at the Authority's offices, which adds 3–6 months.

What We Did

The approach we recommended had three components, executed in parallel.

The first was anchoring. Before filing the residency application, the client needed to establish concrete Israeli ties. He purchased a one-bedroom apartment in north Tel Aviv — a decision he had been considering independently — and we coordinated with the purchasing attorney to ensure the transaction closed before the residency application was submitted. The Tabu (Land Registry) registration in his name served as objective evidence of Israeli domicile. He also opened an Israeli bank account at Discount Bank using his Israeli passport, which was straightforward given his existing Israeli identity number.

The second component was the formal application. We filed a comprehensive restoration application at the Population and Immigration Authority's Jerusalem headquarters in April 2023. The bundle included: his Israeli passport and identity card (teudat zehut), proof of the Tel Aviv apartment purchase, proof of the Discount Bank account, his New York lease agreement (showing that he had a home in the US — which is not a disqualifying factor, as the Authority understands dual residency), a cover letter explaining his life history and intentions, and a supporting affidavit translated into Hebrew.

One issue arose mid-process: the Authority's computer system showed his toshav keva as revoked in 2009, but also showed an outstanding query from 2012 — a form that had been sent to his last known Israeli address (his mother's apartment in Givatayim) that he had never received. The query related to a routine update request. Because it was never responded to, it had generated an administrative note that the Authority's officer initially treated as a flag requiring a personal hearing.

We resolved this by providing a statutory declaration confirming that he had not resided at the Givatayim address after 2001 and had never received the 2012 correspondence. The hearing was waived, and the application proceeded on the documentary record.

The Population and Immigration Authority issued its decision in December 2023: toshav keva status restored, effective immediately, with the classification updated in the national population registry.

With the residency restored, we filed the Kupat Holim enrollment application with Meuhedet — the smallest and most operationally accessible of the four Israeli health funds, which suited his intended pattern of part-year presence. The National Insurance Institute processed the enrollment and confirmed the 6-month waiting period under Section 3A of the National Health Insurance Law 1994. He paid premiums throughout the waiting period (NIS 1,750 per month) and received full coverage from June 2024 onward.

On the Bituach Leumi back-contributions question: the NII conducted a review of his contribution history and determined that no arrears were owed. Because his residency had been formally revoked in 2009, the NII could not assert that he was a "resident who failed to contribute" for the intervening 14 years. The revocation, while administratively unpleasant, had a silver lining.

The tax position was straightforward to structure. He plans to spend October through February in Tel Aviv each year — approximately 150 days. Under the Income Tax Ordinance 1961, this keeps him below both the 183-day annual threshold and the 425-day rolling threshold. His only Israeli-sourced income is expected to be occasional rent from the Tel Aviv apartment on the months he is not there — rental income on a residential apartment by a non-resident is subject to the flat 10% withholding track (maslul aleph) with no deductions, or the progressive rate with deductions. We modelled both options for him; given his low-expense apartment, the 10% flat track was marginally more efficient.

In Practice: Under Section 3A of the National Health Insurance Law 1994, a returning toshav keva who re-registers with Bituach Leumi after an extended absence is subject to a 6-month coverage waiting period. During this period, monthly health insurance premiums must be paid but no benefits are accessible. For a pensioner-status enrollee at NIS 1,750 per month, the waiting period costs NIS 10,500 in premiums before the first shekel of coverage is received. This is substantially less expensive than private Israeli health insurance, which for a 68-year-old male runs NIS 4,000–5,500 per month with exclusions for pre-existing conditions.

The Outcome

Permanent residency was restored in December 2023, approximately 8 months after the initial application. Kupat Holim Meuhedet coverage became active in June 2024. The client is now in his second year of part-year Tel Aviv life, spending northern hemisphere winters in Israel and summers in New York.

The practical savings are meaningful. His Kupat Holim premium of NIS 1,750 per month provides access to Israeli public healthcare at subsidised rates, specialist referrals, and prescription medication at heavily reduced prices. His alternative — private Israeli health insurance for a 68-year-old American — would have cost NIS 4,200–5,500 per month with exclusions for existing conditions.

His Israeli rental income on the months he is away is taxed at 10% flat. Because he is now a toshav keva, he is also entitled to a small annual municipal tax exemption on his apartment under local arnona regulations — a detail his building manager had not mentioned, but which produces a saving of approximately NIS 3,600 per year.

Key Takeaways

What this case illustrates for dual US-Israeli citizens considering a return to Israel:

  1. Israeli citizenship and Israeli permanent residency are legally separate. Holding an Israeli passport does not mean you are an Israeli resident. If you left Israel more than ten years ago and have not engaged with Israeli government authorities since, your permanent residency may have been administratively revoked without your knowledge. Check your status at the Population and Immigration Authority before making plans that depend on Israeli resident rights.

  2. Anchoring before you apply accelerates approval. The Population and Immigration Authority responds to demonstrated intent — not stated intent. Purchasing property or signing a long-term lease before filing your application gives the Authority an objective anchor for your claim to Israeli residence. Applications filed without such evidence often require personal hearings.

  3. The NII back-contribution risk is real but manageable. If your toshav keva was formally revoked (as opposed to lapsing without any official action), the NII generally cannot pursue back-contributions for the revocation period. If the revocation was never formalised, the exposure is higher and should be assessed before re-enrollment.

  4. The 6-month Kupat Holim waiting period is the price of entry — plan around it. If you intend to be in Israel for healthcare during the waiting period, you need private insurance as a bridge. Factor the NIS 10,500 waiting-period cost into your financial planning.

  5. The 183-day rule gives you substantial flexibility. An Israeli citizen living part-time in Israel can spend 4–5 months per year there without triggering Israeli tax residency — provided the stay is managed carefully year to year. The tax residency rules for extended stays are structured to accommodate exactly this kind of lifestyle, but they require active monitoring.


Facing a Similar Situation?

Many Israelis who emigrated to the United States or other countries decades ago are now reaching retirement age and reconsidering their relationship with Israel. Whether you want to restore your residency, access the Israeli health system, or plan a part-year return without tax complications, the legal path is navigable — but it requires knowing where the obstacles are in advance.

Contact us for a confidential consultation about restoring your Israeli permanent residency.

Key Takeaways for Non-Residents

This case illustrates the importance of engaging experienced Israeli legal counsel early in the process. The complexity of cross-border matters — including language barriers, document requirements, and court procedures — makes professional guidance essential.

Related Q&A

Browse all Q&A →
Adv. Eli Shimony

Adv. Eli Shimony

Israeli Attorney

LL.B. + M.B.A.Israeli Bar Association MemberCertified Compliance Officer (ICA)Certified Mediator & Arbitrator

Adv. Eli Shimony is the founder of IsraelNonResident.com and a practising Israeli attorney specialising in inheritance, real estate, and cross-border legal matters for non-resident clients worldwide.

Note: This case study is based on a real matter. All identifying details — including names, locations, nationalities, and financial figures — have been anonymized and modified to protect confidentiality. The outcome described reflects the specific facts of that particular case and does not constitute a guarantee, representation, or warranty of any result in any other matter. Legal outcomes are inherently fact-specific and depend on individual circumstances, applicable law at the time, and factors that vary from case to case. Nothing in this case study constitutes legal advice, and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for qualified legal counsel in any specific situation. See our full disclaimer.