How a US Dual Citizen Cleared Years of Unreported Israeli Accounts

Result: Full US tax compliance achieved through the Streamlined programme, the Israeli account kept open, and the inherited funds left freely transferable · Timeline: 7 months · Challenge: Six years of unreported Israeli accounts surfaced by a FATCA letter · Authority: Israel Tax Authority, Bank of Israel, IRS · Financial Impact: USD 19,000 penalty against willful exposure that could exceed the balance

Background

A woman in New Jersey emailed us at midnight her time, which is a reasonable hour to panic about a letter you cannot read. The letter was from an Israeli bank, mostly in Hebrew, and it asked her to sign and return an IRS Form W-9 along with a self-certification of her tax residency. She is a US citizen by birth and an Israeli citizen by descent through her father, who had died three years earlier. From him she had inherited two accounts at a Tel Aviv branch, a savings account and a small securities portfolio, holding together about NIS 1.4 million. She also had an old shekel account of her own, opened during a student year in Jerusalem and long forgotten.

She had never reported any of it. Not on an FBAR, not on Form 8938, not on her Form 1040. The interest the savings account earned and the dividends the portfolio paid had never appeared on a US return. None of this was a scheme. She had simply never connected "my late father's account in Israel" with "a foreign financial account the US Treasury expects me to declare every year." The bank's letter, with its talk of restricting the account, made the connection for her in the most alarming way possible.

The Challenge

There were two problems, and they were on different clocks. The first was the Israeli bank. Under the FATCA framework, the bank had identified her as a US person and could not keep a compliant file without a valid W-9 and a tax-residency self-certification. Banks in Israel have grown cautious about US account holders, and a US person who does not respond to a FATCA request risks having the account restricted and, in some cases, closed. For a non-resident trying to manage inherited funds from 9,000 kilometres away, a frozen account is not a paperwork problem. It is the difference between being able to move her own inheritance and watching it sit stranded.

The second problem was the IRS. Six years of undisclosed foreign accounts and unreported income is exactly the situation the offshore enforcement regime was built around. The penalties for willful failure to file an FBAR are severe and can, in theory, exceed the value of the account itself. The saving grace was that her conduct was plainly non-willful. She had inherited the accounts, misunderstood the rules, and had no intent to hide anything. That made her a strong candidate for the IRS Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures, the programme designed for US residents whose offshore non-compliance was not willful.

In Practice: Under the FATCA Inter-Governmental Agreement that Israel signed in 2014 and implemented through regulations under the Income Tax Ordinance 1961, an Israeli bank reports a US account holder's year-end balance to the Israel Tax Authority, which transmits it to the IRS. When the bank could not match a valid W-9 to our client's NIS 1.4 million in accounts, it relied on Bank of Israel Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 411 to set a 45-day deadline to produce the form or face restriction of the account. Returning the signed W-9 and self-certification inside that window is what keeps the account open.

What We Did

We are Israeli lawyers, so we took the Israeli half of the matter and coordinated the US filing with a US tax preparer who handles offshore disclosures. Splitting the work this way matters, because each side holds documents the other needs and neither clock waits for the other.

On the Israeli side, we first stopped the bank's deadline from running out. We completed the W-9 and the tax-residency self-certification, confirmed the source of the inherited funds with the tzav yerusha (succession order) from her father's estate so the bank's anti-money-laundering file was clean, and returned everything inside the 45-day window. That alone took the threat of restriction off the table and kept her inheritance liquid.

We then reconstructed the record the US filing would need. We obtained six years of account statements from the Tel Aviv branch and the bank's annual Form 867 tax certificates (ishur shnati), which set out the interest and dividends paid and, importantly, the Israeli tax the bank had already withheld at source. That withheld Israeli tax was not a loss. It became a foreign tax credit on the US returns, which reduced the additional US tax she owed on the same income.

On the US side, our colleague prepared the Streamlined package: three years of amended returns with the missing Schedule B and Forms 8938, six years of delinquent FBARs on FinCEN Form 114, and the Form 14654 certification that the failures were non-willful, setting out her story honestly and in detail. She paid the back tax with interest and the single Streamlined penalty.

The inherited securities portfolio added a wrinkle that catches almost every US person with an Israeli brokerage account. The Israeli mutual funds it held are, for US tax purposes, passive foreign investment companies, which carry their own punitive regime and a separate Form 8621 for each fund. Our US colleague worked through the holdings so the portfolio was reported correctly rather than left as a second undisclosed problem waiting to surface. The aggregate value also sat well above the Form 8938 filing thresholds for a US resident, which is why that form, not just the FBAR, belonged in every year of the package.

Because she could not come to Israel, we handled the bank correspondence under a power of attorney signed before a US notary, apostilled, and translated into Hebrew. The reconstruction of the Israeli income, the credit for Israeli withholding, and the US filing all moved in parallel rather than in sequence, which is how a matter like this gets done in months instead of years.

In Practice: The Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures require three years of amended returns, six years of delinquent FBARs, and a single miscellaneous offshore penalty of 5 percent of the highest year-end aggregate value of the foreign financial assets. On a peak balance of about NIS 1.4 million, roughly USD 385,000, that penalty came to about USD 19,000. Set against willful FBAR penalties that can reach 50 percent of the account balance for each year, the certainty of the Streamlined route was worth far more than the fee.

For the underlying reporting rules, our guide to FATCA and FBAR reporting for US citizens with Israeli accounts walks through what has to be filed and when.

The Outcome

She came into full US compliance under the Streamlined programme. The amended returns, the six years of FBARs, and the non-willful certification were accepted, and the matter closed for the back tax, interest, and the 5 percent penalty of about USD 19,000. The willful exposure that had frightened her at midnight, which could have run past the value of the accounts, never materialised.

On the Israeli side, the bank account stayed open. With a valid W-9 on file and the source of funds documented, the de-risking pressure ended, and she could transfer the inherited money to the United States whenever she chose. We set her up with a simple going-forward routine so the problem never recurs: the bank's annual Form 867 certificate each spring, FBARs and Form 8938 each filing season, and the Israeli withholding claimed as a credit so she is not taxed twice on the same shekels.

Key Takeaways

What this case illustrates for non-residents in similar situations:

1. A FATCA letter from an Israeli bank is a deadline, not a formality. Returning the W-9 and self-certification within the bank's window keeps the account open under Directive 411; ignoring it invites restriction or closure, which can strand inherited funds in Israel.
2. Inherited Israeli accounts are reportable to the US Treasury from the moment you control them, even if you never deposited a single shekel and never set foot in the branch.
3. For non-willful non-compliance, the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures resolve years of exposure for three years of returns, six years of FBARs, and one 5 percent penalty, which is far cheaper and far more certain than waiting to be found.
4. Israeli tax withheld at source on interest and dividends is creditable against US tax, so the real cost of catching up is usually smaller than the headline numbers suggest.
5. Run the Israeli evidence-gathering and the US filing in parallel and keep them coordinated, because the bank's clock and the IRS submission move independently.

---

Facing a Similar Situation?

If an Israeli bank has sent you a FATCA request, or you hold Israeli accounts you have not reported to the IRS, the Israeli and US sides can be handled together so the account stays open and the disclosure is done on the safest available terms.

Contact us for a confidential consultation about your Israeli legal matter.