Case Study๐Ÿ’ผ Israeli Tax LawJune 9, 2026

How a French Shareholder Recovered NIS 60,000 in Over-Withheld Israeli Dividend Tax

A French resident inherited a stake in an Israeli company. When dividends were paid, Israeli tax was withheld at 25% instead of the treaty rate of 15%. Here is how we recovered the difference.

Outcome

We filed a treaty-based refund claim with the Israel Tax Authority and recovered NIS 60,000 within four months. We also implemented a standing reduced-withholding arrangement to prevent over-deduction on all future distributions.

Background

A French resident inherited a 30% shareholding in an Israeli private company from her father five years before she first contacted us. The company had retained most of its earnings during that period, and when the shareholders finally approved a NIS 600,000 dividend distribution, nobody in the process thought to check the France-Israel tax treaty.

The Israeli company's accountant applied the standard withholding rate: 25% on dividends paid to a non-resident individual, deducted NIS 150,000, and remitted the balance of NIS 450,000 to the client's French bank account. The withholding return was filed with the Israel Tax Authority within the required 30-day window. Clean, routine โ€” and, for a French tax resident, completely wrong.

She came to us after her French tax advisor noted the unusually high withholding amount and asked whether a treaty existed. One did. It had been in force since 1997.

The Challenge

The France-Israel Double Taxation Convention caps Israeli withholding on dividends paid to French resident beneficial owners at 15%. The difference between the applied rate and the treaty rate was NIS 60,000 โ€” not a trivial sum on a single distribution.

The complication: recovering over-withheld tax after the fact requires a different process from applying the treaty rate prospectively. The company had already filed the withholding return at 25% and the payment had cleared. Obtaining a refund meant filing a formal treaty-based claim with the ITA's International Taxation Division, obtaining a French residency certificate, and waiting out a review period. None of this is complicated if you know the process, but the six-year limitation on treaty refund claims means people often discover the issue too late.

There was also a second dimension. Going forward, the client expected to receive further dividends as the company continued to grow. A one-off refund would not solve the structural problem โ€” she needed a standing treaty arrangement so the correct rate applied at source.

In Practice: Under Section 170 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1961, Israeli companies must withhold 25% on dividends paid to individual non-resident shareholders and remit that amount to the Israel Tax Authority within 30 days of payment. The France-Israel Double Taxation Convention (in force since 1997) limits Israeli withholding to 15% for beneficial owners who are French tax residents. On a NIS 600,000 dividend, that 10-percentage-point difference equals NIS 60,000. To access the reduced rate prospectively, the non-resident shareholder submits Form 2402 to the ITA's International Taxation Division at least 30 days before dividend payment. Where the standard rate has already been applied, a refund claim under the treaty must be submitted within six years of the withholding date โ€” and the ITA typically completes its review in three to five months.

What We Did

The first step was obtaining a French tax residency certificate โ€” a certificat de rรฉsidence fiscale โ€” from the Direction Gรฉnรฉrale des Finances Publiques. French tax authorities issue these certificates relatively quickly for residents with a clean filing history, typically within two to three weeks. We requested one covering the tax year in which the dividend was paid.

With that certificate in hand, we filed a treaty-based refund claim with the ITA International Taxation Division in Jerusalem. The claim included: the ITA withholding voucher (Form 867) showing the NIS 150,000 deducted; the French residency certificate; a declaration of beneficial ownership confirming the client โ€” not a nominee or intermediary โ€” received the dividend; and Form 2402 specifying the treaty-reduced rate.

The ITA raised one question during the review: they wanted confirmation that the client was the substantive beneficial owner of the shares and not holding them on behalf of another party. We provided the inheritance order (tzav yerusha) and the company's shareholder register extract. The ITA accepted this and closed the query within three weeks.

While the refund was processing, we filed a prospective Form 2402 for all future dividends from this company. This standing approval โ€” which the ITA issues for up to three years at a time โ€” instructs the company's accountant to withhold at 15% on all subsequent distributions without the need to re-apply each time.

The ITA issued the NIS 60,000 refund directly to the client's French IBAN via SWIFT transfer approximately four months after we filed the initial claim.

The French dimension also required attention. Dividends from Israeli companies must be reported on the French annual tax return (dรฉclaration de revenus). Article 10 of the France-Israel treaty establishes a tax credit mechanism: the 15% Israeli withholding is credited against the French personal income tax due on the same dividend income, avoiding double taxation. We coordinated with the client's French tax advisor to ensure the Israeli withholding certificate and the gross dividend amount were correctly reflected on the French return.

The Outcome

The ITA refunded NIS 60,000 within the four-month review window. The standing reduced-withholding approval is in place for the next three annual cycles. For subsequent dividends, the company applies 15% at source, the client receives the correct net amount immediately, and no refund process is needed.

The client's total cost of the exercise โ€” legal fees, coordination with the French advisor, and ITA filing โ€” came to approximately NIS 8,000. Against the NIS 60,000 recovered, the return is obvious. What is less obvious, until you see the numbers, is that this situation arises regularly: Israeli companies distributing dividends to non-resident shareholders, with no one in the chain checking whether a bilateral treaty modifies the default withholding rate.

For further background on how the France-Israel treaty operates across different income categories, see our guide on the France-Israel double taxation convention for French residents.

Key Takeaways

What this case illustrates for French residents with stakes in Israeli companies:

  1. Israeli withholding defaults to 25% on dividends โ€” the treaty rate does not apply automatically. Someone must check, and someone must file Form 2402 before payment or a refund claim afterward.
  2. The six-year limitation period on treaty refund claims is real. French shareholders who have received Israeli dividends in recent years and are uncertain about the rate applied should request the withholding voucher from the Israeli company and verify.
  3. A standing reduced-withholding approval (Form 2402) eliminates the need for a fresh application before each distribution. The cost of obtaining it is modest; the cost of not having it accumulates with every dividend round.
  4. French tax law requires reporting the gross dividend (not the net amount received) on the French return. The Israeli withholding certificate is the supporting document for the credit claim โ€” losing it creates unnecessary complications at the French end.

Facing a Similar Situation?

French residents who hold shares in Israeli companies โ€” whether inherited, purchased, or received as consideration for services โ€” frequently overpay Israeli withholding tax simply because no one in the process applied the treaty. We identify the exposure, recover what has been over-withheld, and put the right structure in place for future distributions.

Contact us for a confidential consultation about your Israeli tax matter.

Key Takeaways for Non-Residents

This case illustrates the importance of engaging experienced Israeli legal counsel early in the process. The complexity of cross-border matters โ€” including language barriers, document requirements, and court procedures โ€” makes professional guidance essential.

Related Q&A

Browse all Q&A โ†’
Adv. Eli Shimony

Adv. Eli Shimony

Israeli Attorney

LL.B. + M.B.A.Israeli Bar Association MemberCertified Compliance Officer (ICA)Certified Mediator & Arbitrator

Adv. Eli Shimony is the founder of IsraelNonResident.com and a practising Israeli attorney specialising in inheritance, real estate, and cross-border legal matters for non-resident clients worldwide.

Note: This case study is based on a real matter. All identifying details โ€” including names, locations, nationalities, and financial figures โ€” have been anonymized and modified to protect confidentiality. The outcome described reflects the specific facts of that particular case and does not constitute a guarantee, representation, or warranty of any result in any other matter. Legal outcomes are inherently fact-specific and depend on individual circumstances, applicable law at the time, and factors that vary from case to case. Nothing in this case study constitutes legal advice, and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for qualified legal counsel in any specific situation. See our full disclaimer.