How a French Landlord Evicted a Defaulting Tenant and Recovered Rent Arrears in Israel
A Lyonnaise architect owned a Jerusalem apartment whose tenant stopped paying rent for six months. We recovered NIS 43,000 in arrears and returned possession in under eight months — entirely from France.
Outcome
Physical possession of the apartment was recovered eight months after instruction. NIS 29,000 of the NIS 43,000 in arrears was recovered by bank attachment through the Execution Office. The entire process was conducted from France without a single visit to Israel.
Result: Tenant evicted; NIS 29,000 of NIS 43,000 arrears recovered by bank attachment · Timeline: 8 months · Challenge: Non-resident landlord in France; tenant had vacated registered address and was unlocatable · Authority: Tel Aviv Execution Office (Hotzaa LaPoal); Jerusalem Magistrates' Court · Financial Impact: NIS 43,000 in arrears; NIS 420,000 apartment returned to full possession
Background
A 51-year-old architect from Lyon purchased a Jerusalem apartment in 2017 for NIS 980,000. It had generated consistent rental income since then at NIS 7,200 per month, which he declared in France under his French tax return, taking a credit for the 10% Israeli tax withheld at source under the France-Israel tax treaty. In early 2024, the tenant — a freelance translator — stopped paying rent entirely. Messages went unanswered. Six months passed. The arrears reached NIS 43,200.
The landlord's first instinct was to apply the legal framework he knew from France. Under French tenancy law, a landlord facing non-payment typically serves a notice via bailiff (huissier), waits for a judicial procedure that can take 18 to 36 months, and then faces the winter moratorium that suspends evictions entirely between November and March. He expected something similar in Israel.
Israeli residential tenancy law bears no resemblance to the French model.
The Challenge
The landlord's lease agreement contained an execution clause (tnat bitzua) — a standard provision in Israeli residential leases that makes the agreement enforceable directly through the Execution Office (Hotzaa LaPoal) without requiring a separate civil judgment. Under Section 81A of the Execution Law 1967, a debt that is quantifiable and arises from an instrument with an execution clause can be recovered through the Execution Office as if it were a court-issued judgment. That is, in theory, a significantly faster path than litigation.
The practical problem was locating the tenant. He had stopped responding to messages at the phone number registered in the lease, and when the landlord's property manager visited the apartment, it was unclear whether the tenant was still living there or had abandoned it. Service of formal legal process requires a known address. Without one, even the execution clause could not be activated until the process could be effected on the tenant.
A separate issue: the tenant had, at the start of the tenancy, registered two minor children from a prior relationship at the apartment address for school enrolment. Under Article 38 of the Execution Law 1967, an eviction that would displace minor children must be preceded by notification to the welfare authority (Rashut LaRavaha) and a welfare assessment. That step adds time. If the children were still living at the address, it could also complicate the eviction itself.
In Practice: Under Section 81A of the Execution Law 1967, a residential lease agreement with a valid execution clause (tnat bitzua) is treated as an enforceable instrument equivalent to a court judgment. For rent arrears of a quantifiable amount, the Jerusalem Execution Office can process the filing and issue a payment demand within two to four weeks of submission. Where the tenant's whereabouts are unknown, a court-assisted Population Authority search to confirm or update the registered address takes approximately three weeks via the Jerusalem Magistrates' Court. Attaching an Israeli bank account takes an additional ten to fourteen days once the financial investigation order is issued by the Execution Office.
What We Did
The first step was the power of attorney. The landlord executed a detailed Hebrew-language POA before a French notary (notaire) in Lyon, authorizing us to represent him before all Israeli courts, the Execution Office, and the Population and Immigration Authority. The acte notarié was apostilled by the Procureur Général of the relevant regional court of appeal under French apostille procedure and couriered to Israel within 12 days. From that point, the landlord needed no further involvement in Israeli proceedings beyond email updates.
We filed an application at the Jerusalem Magistrates' Court for authorization to query the Population Authority's address database for the tenant's current registered address. The court issued the order within three weeks. The Population Authority confirmed the tenant had not updated his registered address — the apartment itself was still on record as his address. Service at the apartment address was therefore legally valid for all purposes.
With a valid service address established, we filed the execution application with the Jerusalem Execution Office under Section 81A. We attached the lease agreement with its execution clause, a six-month payment history showing zero payments, and a calculation of NIS 43,200 in principal arrears plus contractual late interest. The Execution Office issued a formal payment demand (drishat tashlum) to the tenant's registered address within three weeks.
The Article 38 welfare notification was made immediately in parallel. The Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs and Social Services conducted a welfare check on the registered children. Their assessment, returned within four weeks, confirmed that the children had not resided at the apartment for over a year — the tenant had relocated them before abandoning the property. The welfare authority issued a non-objection certificate, clearing the Article 38 obstacle.
At the point of the welfare clearance, we applied to the Execution Office for a financial investigation order. This authorized the Execution Office to query Israeli banking databases for accounts held in the tenant's name. His account at Bank Leumi was identified within ten days. The Execution Office attached NIS 29,000 held in that account — NIS 14,200 fell short of the total arrears but represented immediate recovery of the majority.
Physical possession proceedings ran alongside the financial recovery. An Execution Office bailiff (katzin bitzua) attended the apartment with a licensed locksmith. The apartment was empty. The bailiff documented the condition of the property and formally returned possession to our care. The landlord's property manager re-keyed the apartment the same day.
In Practice: Article 38 of the Execution Law 1967 requires that before enforcing an eviction order that would displace minor children registered at the address, the Execution Office must notify the welfare authority and wait for its assessment. This step is mandatory even if the landlord has reason to believe the children have already left. In practice, the welfare authority's response time is three to five weeks for Jerusalem cases. Where the children are found not to be residing at the property, the welfare authority issues a non-objection certificate, and enforcement proceeds normally. The step cannot be skipped or shortcut — but it rarely delays proceedings by more than a month.
The Outcome
Physical possession was recovered eight months after the initial instruction. NIS 29,000 of the NIS 43,200 in arrears was attached from the tenant's bank account by the Execution Office. The remaining NIS 14,200 was registered as a judgment debt in the Israeli Execution Registry, attaching automatically to any future Israeli bank account or salary the tenant holds.
The apartment was returned in reasonable condition. The landlord authorized a professional clean and minor repairs totalling approximately NIS 8,000, which were added to the judgment debt total. He re-let the apartment within six weeks at NIS 7,800 per month to a new tenant — NIS 600 above the previous rate.
On the French tax side, the landlord was advised by his French accountant that the six months of unpaid rent still needed to be considered carefully. Under French tax law, rental income that is contractually due but not received may still be assessable depending on the category of income declared. The French tax service (Direction Générale des Finances Publiques) requires landlords to demonstrate active recovery steps to support a bad-debt deduction for unrecovered rental income. The documentation from the Execution Office proceedings — particularly the bank attachment record and the registered judgment debt — provided exactly the documentary trail his accountant needed.
Key Takeaways
What this case illustrates for French and other non-resident landlords managing Israeli rental property:
-
Israeli eviction law is not like French tenancy law. There is no winter moratorium, no 18-month judicial process, and no equivalent of the French trêve hivernale. An execution clause in a valid Israeli lease agreement gives a landlord a direct route to the Execution Office without court litigation — and the Execution Office can effect both financial recovery and physical possession.
-
An execution clause in your lease is the single most important protection. Without a tnat bitzua, recovering rent arrears requires a full civil court judgment before the Execution Office can act. Every non-resident landlord should verify that their Israeli lease includes a properly drafted execution clause — ideally reviewed by an Israeli attorney before the tenancy begins.
-
A French-notary apostilled POA replaces personal attendance. A procuration executed before a French notaire and apostilled through the French procedure under the Hague Convention is accepted without question by Israeli courts, the Execution Office, and the Population Authority. The landlord does not need to visit Israel at any stage.
-
Bank attachment is fast and effective. Once the Execution Office identifies an Israeli bank account, it can freeze and attach funds within ten to fourteen days. Even a tenant who appears to have "disappeared" often retains an Israeli bank account. The financial investigation tool is a standard Execution Office mechanism, not an extraordinary remedy.
-
The Article 38 welfare check is mandatory but manageable. Where minor children are registered at an address, the welfare notification step adds three to five weeks. It cannot be skipped. Filing it early — as soon as the execution application is submitted — ensures it runs in parallel with other proceedings rather than sequentially after them.
Facing a Similar Situation?
A defaulting tenant in Israel does not require the landlord to appear in the country — but it does require prompt action and the correct procedural sequence. A well-drafted lease with an execution clause, a valid apostilled POA, and early engagement with the Execution Office will almost always reduce both the timeline and the cost of recovery.
For a broader overview of managing Israeli rental property from abroad, see our guide to managing Israeli rental property as a non-resident.
Contact us for a confidential consultation about your Israeli legal matter.
Key Takeaways for Non-Residents
This case illustrates the importance of engaging experienced Israeli legal counsel early in the process. The complexity of cross-border matters — including language barriers, document requirements, and court procedures — makes professional guidance essential.
Related Q&A

Adv. Eli Shimony
Israeli Attorney
Adv. Eli Shimony is the founder of IsraelNonResident.com and a practising Israeli attorney specialising in inheritance, real estate, and cross-border legal matters for non-resident clients worldwide.
Note: This case study is based on a real matter. All identifying details — including names, locations, nationalities, and financial figures — have been anonymized and modified to protect confidentiality. The outcome described reflects the specific facts of that particular case and does not constitute a guarantee, representation, or warranty of any result in any other matter. Legal outcomes are inherently fact-specific and depend on individual circumstances, applicable law at the time, and factors that vary from case to case. Nothing in this case study constitutes legal advice, and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for qualified legal counsel in any specific situation. See our full disclaimer.