How a Paris Couple Cleared an Israeli Credit File and Saved a Purchase

Result: Credit register corrected from abroad and a NIS 1,600,000 mortgage approved, saving a NIS 320,000 deposit from forfeiture · Timeline: 9 weeks from refusal to approval · Challenge: A settled Israeli loan still reported as in arrears · Authority: Bank of Israel credit data register · Financial Impact: NIS 320,000 deposit preserved on a NIS 3.2M purchase

Background

A couple in the seventeenth arrondissement of Paris signed a contract in April 2026 to buy a four-room apartment near the seafront in Netanya for NIS 3,200,000. She was born in Ashkelon, left Israel in 2007 for a job in France, and has held French nationality since 2014. She still holds her Israeli identity number, as every Israeli citizen does for life. Her husband is French and has never had one.

The contract gave them 45 days to produce a mortgage commitment. The deposit already paid was NIS 320,000, and the contract carried the usual clause allowing the seller to keep it as agreed damages if the buyers failed to complete. Their broker had told them the mortgage was a formality: 50% loan to value, both in secure employment, no debt in France. The bank refused in the third week. It gave no reason beyond a reference to the applicant's credit position, which is the standard formula and tells the applicant nothing.

The Challenge

Israeli consumer lending now runs on a central credit data register operated by the Bank of Israel under the Credit Data Law 5776-2016, live since April 2019, which collects repayment information from banks, credit card companies, non-bank lenders and certain public bodies. The register is keyed to the Israeli identity number. Our client had one, so unlike her husband she was in the system, and what the system said about her decided the file.

She had taken a NIS 90,000 consumer loan from an Israeli lender in 2016 to help her parents with a car and a medical bill, and she settled it in full in 2019 in a single payment made from her French account. What the register showed in 2026 was that the loan remained in arrears. The payment had been booked against a different account number belonging to the same borrower, and the closing entry never reached the reporting file. Nobody had told her, because every notice went to her parents' Ashkelon address, and her parents had moved in 2021.

The second obstacle was access. Section 38(d) of the Credit Data Law gives every person one free data concentration report (doch rikuz netunim) per calendar year, so she was entitled to see exactly what the bank had seen. The online route runs through the Israeli national identification system, which wants an Israeli mobile number for the one-time code and details from a live Israeli identity card or an Israeli credit card. She had none of the three. The telephone line for the credit data system is *6194 and dials only from an Israeli number. A woman sitting in Paris with a 45-day contractual clock had a statutory right to a document she had no practical way of obtaining.

In Practice: Section 38(d) of the Credit Data Law 5776-2016 entitles every person recorded in the register to one free data concentration report per calendar year from the credit data register operated by the Bank of Israel, which has been live since April 2019 and is keyed to the Israeli identity number. Requested online it is issued immediately; requested through a representative holding a specific power of attorney it takes 7 to 21 days. Correction runs against the information source that reported the data, not against the lender that read it. Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 329 then caps a non-resident's housing loan at 50% of value, which on this NIS 3,200,000 apartment fixed the maximum loan at NIS 1,600,000 whatever the credit file said.

What We Did

The first move was the power of attorney, and it had to be specific rather than general, because a representative requesting credit data is exercising a right that belongs to the data subject. We drafted it in Hebrew and French, she signed before a Paris notary, and the notary's chamber issued the apostille. Since 1 May 2025 French apostilles are handled by the notarial chambers rather than the courts of appeal and are issued free of charge, which took a step and a fee out of a timetable that had none to spare. The document was in our hands in six days.

We requested the report and had it in eleven. It showed the 2016 loan as an open obligation with arrears running from 2019 to the report date, which is the profile of a borrower who stopped paying and was never chased, and no Israeli underwriter reads that any other way. It also showed something the client did not expect and was relieved by: no enforcement file at the Execution Office, no restricted account marker, and nothing else adverse. The whole refusal rested on one wrong line.

Correction runs against the source. We wrote to the lender that had reported the data, attaching the 2019 payment confirmation from her French bank, the lender's own receipt, and the account numbers on both sides of the mismatch. Two points mattered in that letter. We asked for the closing entry to be reported to the register with the correct historical date rather than simply marked closed as of 2026, because a loan closed today still shows seven years of arrears behind it. And we asked the lender to confirm the correction in writing to us, so that we had something to give the mortgage bank while the register itself caught up. The lender accepted the position in nineteen days and corrected the reporting file.

In Practice: A specific power of attorney for an Israeli representative to obtain and act on credit data requires notarial authentication of the signature. In Israel that is NIS 197 for the first signatory and NIS 77 for each additional signatory under the Notaries Regulations (Service Fees) 5738-1978, and a notarial translation runs to NIS 251 for the first 100 words plus NIS 197 per further 100. Executed in France instead, the notary's fee applies and the apostille has been issued free of charge by the notarial chambers since 1 May 2025. The whole instrument reached us in six days and is what allowed a Paris resident to exercise a Section 38(d) right that the online system would not give her.

The Outcome

The mortgage bank re-underwrote the file on the corrected data and issued its commitment nine weeks after the original refusal, at NIS 1,600,000, which is the Directive 329 ceiling of 50% of value. The couple completed in August. The NIS 320,000 already with the seller stayed in the transaction instead of being forfeited, and there was no need to renegotiate the price or ask for an extension that the seller had no obligation to grant.

Costs were modest against what was at stake. The notarial power of attorney and its French apostille came to roughly EUR 180, the report was free under Section 38(d), and our fees for the correspondence and the correction were about NIS 7,800. The interest rate offered on the corrected file was materially better than the rate the bank had quoted informally before the refusal, because pricing follows the credit picture and a borrower with seven years of phantom arrears is not priced as a good risk.

The part of the outcome the client cared about most does not appear in the arithmetic. She had spent three weeks believing the refusal meant something about her, and had begun to suspect a family member of having used her identity number. It was a booking error at a lender, seven years old, that nobody had any reason to notice.

Key Takeaways

What this case illustrates for non-residents in similar situations:

1. An Israeli identity number means an Israeli credit file, whatever passport you now carry and however long you have been gone. A person who has never held one has no file at all, which is a different problem and produces a different bank response.
2. Pull the report before you apply, not after a refusal. Section 38(d) gives one free data concentration report a calendar year, and finding an error at the start of a 45-day financing clause is a different exercise from finding it in week three.
3. The online route is built for people inside Israel. Without an Israeli mobile number, a live identity card or an Israeli credit card, the practical route is a specific power of attorney to an Israeli representative, and that takes 7 to 21 days rather than the instant online issue.
4. Correct against the source, not against the bank that refused you. The mortgage lender only read the data. The lender that reported it is the one that must fix it, and it should be asked to restate the closing date historically rather than close the record as of today.
5. Directive 329 caps a non-resident housing loan at 50% of value regardless of how good the file is, so the equity requirement does not improve with a clean report. Plan the cash side to the ceiling, as our guide to why Israeli banks reject non-residents explains.

---

Facing a Similar Situation?

An Israeli mortgage refusal that comes with no stated reason is usually a credit register entry, and from abroad the obstacle is more often access to the file than the contents of it. We obtain the data concentration report under a specific power of attorney, check it against the enforcement and restricted account registers, and run the correction with the reporting source before your financing deadline expires. Our answer on getting your Israeli credit file as a non-resident sets out the mechanics.

Contact us for a confidential consultation about your Israeli legal matter.