Company FormationUpdated August 28, 2026·9 min read

Franchising in Israel: A Guide for US Franchisors

How a US franchise brand enters Israel: no franchise statute, the competition block exemption, trademark protection, royalty tax under the treaty, and disputes.

Adv. Eli Shimony

Adv. Eli Shimony

Israeli Attorney

A US quick-service or fitness brand signs a master franchisee in Tel Aviv and sends over the same pre-sale machinery it uses at home: a Franchise Disclosure Document, a state registration check, a 14-day cooling period. The Israeli lawyer on the other end reads it, pauses, and explains that none of it is required here, because Israel has no franchise law at all. That is not a gap in the paperwork. It is the single most important fact a foreign franchisor needs to understand before entering the Israeli market, and it changes how you draft, how you protect the brand, and how much you can rely on the contract you sign from three thousand miles away.

Israel regulates franchising almost entirely through general commercial law rather than a dedicated statute. For a US franchisor used to the FTC Franchise Rule (16 CFR Part 436) and state relationship laws, this feels like operating without a net. In practice it means the protections you take for granted have to be written into the agreement itself, and the risks Israeli law does impose come from a direction most American brands never look: competition law. This guide walks a non-resident franchisor through what applies, what does not, and where the money is actually lost.


Israel Has No Franchise Statute

Start with what is missing. There is no Israeli franchise act, no registration authority, and no obligation to hand a prospective franchisee a disclosure document, a financial forecast, or a list of existing outlets before signature. The FTC Franchise Rule obliges a US franchisor to furnish the current Franchise Disclosure Document at least 14 calendar days before the franchisee signs or pays anything. Nothing in Israeli law reproduces that. A franchisee in Haifa can sign on the day the deal is presented, having seen nothing but the contract in front of them.

What fills the space is the ordinary law of contract, and it is thinner than American counsel expect. Section 12 of the Contracts (General Part) Law 1973 imposes a duty to negotiate in good faith, and Israeli courts have used it to award damages where a franchisor concealed material facts about an unprofitable network. But that is compensation decided case by case after a dispute, not a safe harbour you can comply with in advance. There is no filing that inoculates you.

The asymmetry cuts both ways, which foreign brands often miss. If no regime forces you to disclose, none forces your Israeli franchisee to open its books to you either. You will be relying on due diligence you commission yourself, from Israel, rather than on prescribed filings. A franchisor signing from the United States has to build its own verification: audited financials, a title check on the premises, confirmation that the local partner is not already litigating with a competing brand.

In Practice: Israel has no franchise disclosure statute. Pre-contractual conduct is governed by Section 12 of the Contracts (General Part) Law 1973, enforced by the Israeli courts rather than a regulator, and damages for bad-faith concealment are assessed individually. A US franchisor cannot rely on the FTC Franchise Rule's 14-day disclosure window here, and localising a master franchise agreement through Israeli counsel typically costs NIS 18,000 to NIS 40,000 and takes three to six weeks including the round of comments a party abroad needs.

The Competition Law Trap

Here is where a standard US franchise agreement gets into real trouble. The clauses that make franchising work, territorial exclusivity, resale price and channel restrictions, and post-term non-competes, are all restrictive arrangements under the Economic Competition Law 1988. A restrictive arrangement is criminal in Israel unless it is exempted or approved. An American franchisor who simply lifts its domestic contract into a Hebrew translation can be signing an unlawful instrument without knowing it.

The cure is the Economic Competition Rules (Block Exemption for Franchise Agreements) (Temporary Order) 2001, made under the 1988 Law and administered by the Israel Competition Authority. It lifts the restrictive-arrangement risk, but only where three conditions hold: the franchisor and franchisee are not actual competitors, neither holds monopoly power in the relevant market or an adjacent one, and the agreement runs for less than ten years. This is the one place Israeli legislation even defines a franchise agreement, and it does so as a competition instrument, not a consumer-protection one.

Two timing points matter for anyone signing now. First, every block exemption is temporary. This one is in force until 15 September 2026, and the Israel Competition Authority published draft extension rules for public comment on 20 May 2026, with the consultation closing on 19 July 2026. A franchisor entering the market should confirm its current status before relying on it. Second, the ten-year ceiling is a live drafting trap. US and international brands routinely write fifteen or twenty-year franchise terms because that is the home-market norm. In Israel that single number can push the whole arrangement outside the exemption and back into restrictive-arrangement territory.

In Practice: Territorial and non-compete clauses are restrictive arrangements under the Economic Competition Law 1988 and are lawful only under the Block Exemption for Franchise Agreements (Temporary Order) 2001, administered by the Israel Competition Authority and in force until 15 September 2026 pending the extension consulted on in May 2026. The exemption fails if the term reaches ten years or if the parties are actual competitors, and an unexempted restrictive arrangement is a criminal offence, so review the term and the parties' market positions before signature rather than after.

Protecting the Brand From Abroad

For a franchisor the brand is the asset, and Israeli law protects the person on the register, not the person who created the mark abroad. Register the trademark in Israel, in your own name, before the franchisee begins trading. A local partner who registers first, or an unrelated party who spots an unprotected US brand entering the market, becomes very expensive to dislodge. This is not theoretical: distributor and franchisee trademark grabs are a recurring Israeli dispute, and the foreign owner usually pays to buy back its own name.

Registration runs through the Israel Patent Office under the Trade Marks Ordinance [New Version] 1972. Official fees are roughly NIS 1,700 per class, and registration takes 12 to 18 months from filing, which is why it has to start well ahead of launch rather than alongside it. A US franchisor can file from abroad through an Israeli trademark attorney under a power of attorney, without travelling. The deeper mechanics of filing an Israeli mark as a US company are covered in our guide to registering a trademark in Israel as a US company.

Because you file and manage the mark remotely, build the licence into the franchise agreement explicitly: the franchisee uses the mark under a revocable licence, acknowledges your ownership, and assigns any goodwill and any local registration back to you on termination. Without that clause, a franchisee who has traded under your brand for years can argue it built the local goodwill itself.

Common Mistake: A US franchisor lets the Israeli master franchisee register the trademark locally "for convenience" because the franchisee is already on the ground. When the relationship sours, the franchisee holds the registered mark at the Israel Patent Office and can block the brand's re-entry. Recovering it through a cancellation action or a negotiated buy-back commonly costs NIS 60,000 to NIS 150,000 and adds 12 to 24 months, against the roughly NIS 1,700 per class it would have cost to register in the franchisor's own name at the outset.

Royalty and Franchise-Fee Tax for a US Franchisor

Money flowing from an Israeli franchisee back to a US franchisor is taxed on both sides, and the treaty decides how much stays in Israel. Under Article 14 of the US-Israel income tax treaty, trademark, patent and know-how payments are industrial royalties, and Israeli withholding on them is capped at 15%. Royalties for copyrights and for film or broadcast material sit at a lower 10% cap, which can matter where a franchise package bundles training films or branded content. The reduced rate is not automatic. The franchisee, as payer, must obtain a reduced-withholding approval from the Israel Tax Authority before the royalty is paid, or it will withhold at the higher domestic rate and leave you to reclaim the difference.

The same royalty is income in the United States. A US franchisor is taxed on its worldwide income regardless of the treaty, so the Israeli tax paid becomes a foreign tax credit claimed on Form 1116 rather than a saving. Structure the fee stream deliberately: an initial franchise fee, ongoing royalties, and any supply margin are taxed differently, and lumping them together can push more of the payment into the 15% withholding band than necessary. The withholding mechanics for cross-border payments out of Israel are set out in our guide to Israeli withholding tax on payments to non-residents.

Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Disputes

US franchisors instinctively write their home state's law and courts into the contract. In Israel that instinct is only half-safe. A foreign governing-law clause will usually be respected on the substance of the contract, but Israeli courts read foreign jurisdiction clauses narrowly and will not automatically decline to hear a claim brought by or against an Israeli party, particularly where the performance and the outlets are in Israel. Assuming a Delaware forum clause keeps you out of an Israeli courtroom is a mistake that surfaces only once a dispute has started.

For cross-border franchise relationships, a well-drafted arbitration clause is often the cleaner answer, because an award is easier to enforce internationally than a foreign court judgment. If you go that route, choose the seat and the institution deliberately and check that the clause meets Israeli requirements. Our guide to arbitration in Israel for foreign parties explains how Israeli law treats an award and what a foreign party has to watch. Whichever path you choose, decide it before signing, not when the first franchisee stops paying royalties.

What Often Goes Wrong

The failures cluster in predictable places. A brand copies its domestic agreement wholesale and imports both the fifteen-year term and the disclosure assumptions, then discovers the term voids the block exemption and the disclosure it relied on was never delivered. A franchisor delays trademark registration until launch, and a squatter files in the gap. A US company assumes citizenship-based reporting stops at its borders and forgets that the Israeli royalty is also US-taxable. And, repeatedly, a foreign franchisor treats the absence of a franchise statute as freedom rather than as exposure, and signs a contract that has to do all the protective work Israeli law simply does not.

Practical Checklist

  • Confirm the block exemption's status before signing, and keep the franchise term under ten years so the restrictive clauses stay lawful
  • Register your trademark at the Israel Patent Office in your own name, in the relevant classes, before the first outlet opens
  • Localise the agreement through Israeli counsel rather than translating your US contract, and drop the FDD framework you cannot rely on here
  • Build an explicit, revocable trademark licence with goodwill assigning back to you on termination
  • Obtain the Israel Tax Authority reduced-withholding approval before royalties are paid, and plan the Form 1116 credit on the US side
  • Decide governing law and dispute resolution deliberately, and do not assume a US jurisdiction clause binds an Israeli court

Speak With an Israeli Attorney

Entering Israel as a franchisor turns on getting three things right before you sign: the competition block exemption, the trademark, and the tax on royalties leaving the country. We localise franchise agreements for foreign brands, check the arrangement against the Economic Competition Law, and secure the mark before the first franchisee trades.

Contact us for a confidential initial consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Israel has never enacted a franchise statute, and there is no counterpart to the Franchise Disclosure Document that the FTC Franchise Rule (16 CFR Part 436) requires you to deliver 14 calendar days before signing. Pre-contract conduct is governed only by the general good-faith duty in Section 12 of the Contracts (General Part) Law 1973, which is a remedy after the fact rather than a checklist.

Related Questions

Common questions on this topic answered by our attorneys.

Real Case Studies

How non-residents resolved similar situations with our help.

Related Guides

About the Author

Adv. Eli Shimony

Adv. Eli Shimony

Israeli Attorney

LL.B. + M.B.A.Israeli Bar Association MemberCertified Compliance Officer (ICA)Certified Mediator & Arbitrator

Adv. Eli Shimony is the founder of IsraelNonResident.com and a practising Israeli attorney specialising in inheritance, real estate, and cross-border legal matters for non-resident clients worldwide.

Legal Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Israeli law is complex and fact-specific. Always consult with a qualified Israeli attorney before taking any action regarding your specific situation. See our full disclaimer.